Elon Musk asked a judge to block OpenAI's attempt to transition from nonprofit to for-profit. It's not the first time he's feuded with CEO Sam Altman.

Bannon tore into Musk, revealing another fissure in the MAGA world over Trump's highly touted Stargate project.

Elon Musk, the close Trump adviser who has his own AI company and was notably not at the press conference, erupted Wednesday with a relentless stream of online mockery. “They don’t actually have the money,

Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman are fighting on X about Stargate, the infrastructure project to build data centers for OpenAI in the U.S.

Stargate is supposed to spend $500 billion on AI infrastructure, President Trump said. But Elon Musk suggested that the venture has much less cash.

Elon Musk doesn’t miss an opportunity to take a dig at OpenAI — even when the news item in question is supposed to be favorable to President Trump. Just a few hours after yesterday’s White House presser on The Stargate Project wrapped up, Musk posted on X that “they don’t actually have the money.”

Shortly after OpenAI announced a $500 billion AI infrastructure project, Elon Musk took to X to claim the whole thing a sham.

(CNN) — Shortly after President Donald Trump announced a new massive AI infrastructure investment from the White House, “First Buddy” Elon Musk tried to tear it down. “They don’t actually have the money,” Musk wrote on his social media platform X. “SoftBank has well under $10B secured. I have that on good authority.”

But within hours of the announcement, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk had already started taking shots at Trump's highly touted project. Newsweek reached out to SpaceX and a White House spok

Elon Musk has painted himself as a humanitarian figure building a utopian future through a passel of companies. Don’t fall for it. The billionaire’s silence on the sudden reversal of US government guidelines for building safer artificial intelligence shows his priorities are political capital — and his own business interests.

The Stargate project has big implications for U.S. AI leadership, but also for who's winning the new president's ear.